The 2017 classification, detailed in a comprehensive PDF, represents a significant shift, acknowledging periodontitis’s prevalence and the impact of age and gender on tissues.
Historical Context of Periodontal Classification
Historically, the American Academy of Periodontology (AAP) has iteratively refined periodontal disease classifications over four decades. The initial 1977 system, while foundational, revealed limitations prompting revisions. The 1999 classification attempted improvements, yet evolving understanding of the disease’s complexities necessitated further change.
These earlier systems, now superseded by the 2017 workshop’s output (available as a PDF resource), often focused narrowly on host-mediated destruction. The current classification, detailed within the PDF, reflects a more holistic view, integrating factors like patient age, systemic health, and disease progression—a marked departure from prior approaches.
Need for a Revised Classification System (as of 12/03/2025)
As of today, December 3rd, 2025, the need for a standardized, contemporary periodontal classification remains critical. Existing research, summarized in the comprehensive 2017 PDF, highlights periodontitis’s widespread prevalence and the significant influence of patient-specific factors like age and gender on tissue response.
The previous systems proved inadequate for accurately reflecting the disease’s dynamic nature. The updated PDF-accessible classification addresses these shortcomings, offering clinicians a more nuanced framework for diagnosis, treatment planning, and prognosis, ultimately improving patient care.
The Role of the American Academy of Periodontology (AAP)
The American Academy of Periodontology (AAP) has been central to evolving periodontal classification, with multiple revisions over the last forty years. The detailed 2017 classification, available as a PDF resource, represents their most recent and comprehensive effort.

The AAP spearheaded the World Workshop, fostering international collaboration to address shortcomings in prior systems. This PDF-documented process aimed to create a globally accepted standard, enhancing diagnostic consistency and facilitating research into periodontitis and related conditions.
Shortcomings of Previous Classifications (Pre-2017)
Prior to 2017, classifications like the 1977 system had notable limitations, prompting the AAP to develop a revised, PDF-based framework.
Limitations of the 1977 Classification
The 1977 classification, while foundational, proved inadequate over time. It primarily focused on radiographic bone loss, neglecting crucial aspects like clinical attachment levels and inflammation. This system lacked the nuance to accurately represent the diverse presentations of periodontal disease, hindering consistent diagnosis and treatment planning.
Furthermore, it didn’t fully address the influence of systemic factors or individual patient risk profiles. The subsequent need for a more comprehensive system, now available as a detailed PDF resource, became increasingly apparent as understanding of periodontal pathology evolved.
Issues with the 1999 Classification
The 1999 classification, though an improvement, still faced challenges. It categorized disease based on the extent of attachment loss, but lacked clarity regarding the severity of inflammation and the patient’s risk for further progression. This led to inconsistencies in diagnosis and treatment approaches among clinicians.
The system’s focus on host-mediated destruction, detailed in updated PDF guides, proved limiting as research highlighted the complex interplay between bacteria and the host immune response. A more holistic approach was needed, paving the way for the 2017 revisions.
The Evolving Understanding of Periodontal Disease
Research continually refined our understanding of periodontal disease, moving beyond simple descriptions of attachment loss. The detailed PDF resources now emphasize the importance of considering the patient’s individual risk factors, including systemic diseases and genetic predisposition.
This shift acknowledged that periodontitis isn’t a single entity, but a spectrum of conditions with varying rates of progression and severity. The 2017 classification reflects this nuanced view, offering a more comprehensive framework for diagnosis and treatment planning.
The 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions
The 2017 workshop, documented in a detailed PDF, established a new framework, prioritizing international consensus and a holistic approach to periodontal health.
Key Objectives of the 2017 Workshop
The primary goal of the 2017 workshop, fully outlined in the new classification PDF, was to create a globally consistent and clinically relevant system. This involved moving beyond solely host-mediated destruction, embracing a more comprehensive view of periodontal diseases and conditions.
A key objective was to better reflect current understanding, incorporating peri-implant diseases alongside traditional periodontitis. The workshop aimed to standardize diagnostic criteria and facilitate improved communication among clinicians and researchers worldwide, all detailed within the accessible PDF resource.
International Collaboration and Consensus
The development of the new periodontal classification, documented in the comprehensive PDF, was a truly international effort. Experts from around the globe convened to achieve consensus, ensuring broad applicability and acceptance. This collaborative process involved extensive review of existing literature and clinical data.
The resulting classification reflects a unified approach, minimizing regional variations in diagnosis and treatment planning. The PDF serves as a testament to this global cooperation, providing a standardized framework for periodontal care worldwide.
Shift from Host-Mediated Destruction to a More Holistic Approach
The new periodontal classification, fully detailed within the accessible PDF, marks a departure from solely focusing on host-mediated destruction. It embraces a more holistic view, recognizing the interplay of bacterial infection, host response, and environmental factors.
This shift acknowledges that periodontal disease isn’t simply about inflammation; it’s a complex interaction. The PDF emphasizes considering systemic diseases and patient-specific risk factors for a comprehensive assessment and tailored treatment plan.

Core Components of the New Classification
The PDF outlines a system based on stages (I-IV) and grades (A-C), redefining periodontal disease with a new paradigm for accurate diagnosis.
Defining Periodontal Disease – A New Paradigm
The 2017 classification, accessible as a detailed PDF, moved away from a solely host-mediated destruction model. It now embraces a more holistic view, recognizing the interplay between host response, microbial factors, and environmental influences.
This paradigm shift emphasizes a continuous spectrum of disease rather than discrete categories. The PDF highlights that periodontitis isn’t simply about attachment loss; it’s a dynamic process influenced by individual risk factors.
Consequently, the new system focuses on characterizing the disease based on stage and grade, providing a more nuanced and clinically relevant assessment.
Stages of Periodontitis (I-IV)
The 2017 classification PDF outlines four stages of periodontitis, reflecting the severity of disease. Stage I represents minimal attachment loss, while Stage II indicates moderate loss. Stage III signifies moderate to severe loss, and Stage IV denotes severe and extensive attachment loss.
Importantly, staging isn’t solely based on attachment levels; it considers radiographic bone loss and patient factors. The PDF emphasizes that progression isn’t always linear, and patients can experience variations.
Accurate staging, as detailed in the document, is crucial for treatment planning and prognosis.
Grades of Periodontitis (A-C)
The 2017 classification PDF introduces grades (A-C) to categorize risk and rate of progression. Grade A signifies minimal risk, with a slow rate of attachment and bone loss. Grade B represents moderate risk, indicating a moderate rate of progression. Grade C denotes high risk, characterized by a rapid rate of attachment and bone loss.
The PDF clarifies that grading considers factors beyond clinical attachment loss, including systemic diseases and patient age.
Grading assists in tailoring treatment and monitoring plans.
Understanding Periodontal Stages
The PDF outlines four stages (I-IV), ranging from gingivitis to severe periodontitis, based on attachment loss and radiographic bone destruction levels.
Stage I: Gingivitis
As detailed within the new periodontal classification PDF, Stage I represents gingivitis, characterized by clinical signs of inflammation – redness, swelling, and bleeding upon probing – but without any loss of clinical attachment or bone. This initial stage is often reversible with proper oral hygiene and professional treatment. The PDF emphasizes that gingivitis is not periodontitis, but a precursor that, if left untreated, can progress. Early detection and intervention are crucial at this stage to prevent the development of more severe periodontal disease, as outlined in the comprehensive document.
Stage II: Early Periodontitis
The new periodontal classification PDF defines Stage II as early periodontitis, indicating some loss of attachment, but not exceeding 1-2mm, and minimal bone loss. Inflammation is present, alongside potential pocket formation. This stage signifies the transition from reversible gingivitis to irreversible periodontal damage. The PDF stresses the importance of thorough assessment and individualized treatment plans to halt progression. While still potentially manageable, Stage II requires diligent patient compliance and professional intervention to prevent advancement to more severe stages, as detailed within the classification.
Stage III: Moderate Periodontitis
According to the new periodontal classification PDF, Stage III represents moderate periodontitis, characterized by moderate attachment loss – typically 3-4mm – and moderate bone loss extending to the middle third of the root. Deeper pockets are common, and inflammation persists. The PDF highlights that this stage often involves a more complex treatment approach, potentially including surgical interventions. Careful consideration of the patient’s grade (risk) is crucial, as detailed in the document, to tailor treatment and manage the disease effectively, preventing further deterioration.
Stage IV: Severe Periodontitis
The new periodontal classification PDF defines Stage IV as severe periodontitis, exhibiting significant attachment and bone loss – exceeding 5mm – extending beyond the middle third of the root. Deep pockets and potential tooth loss are prominent features. This stage, as outlined in the PDF, often requires advanced surgical procedures and multidisciplinary care. The document emphasizes that managing Stage IV necessitates a comprehensive approach, factoring in the patient’s grade to mitigate further destruction and preserve remaining dentition.

Defining Periodontal Grades
The 2017 classification PDF introduces Grades A-C, assessing risk factors and disease progression, independent of stage, to refine treatment planning and prognosis.
Grade A: Minimal Risk
As outlined in the new periodontal classification PDF, Grade A signifies minimal risk, characterized by a lack of rapid progression and limited inflammation. Patients typically exhibit excellent compliance with oral hygiene practices and demonstrate a strong host response.
Radiographic bone loss is minimal, and probing depths are generally shallow. This grade suggests a favorable prognosis with consistent maintenance therapy. Systemic factors impacting periodontal health are typically absent or well-controlled, contributing to the stability of the periodontium.

Grade B: Moderate Risk
The new periodontal classification PDF details Grade B as representing moderate risk, indicating a detectable, yet not rapid, rate of periodontal destruction. Patients may exhibit some systemic risk factors or inconsistencies in their oral hygiene routines.
Moderate bone loss is evident radiographically, and probing depths are generally within a moderate range. While maintenance therapy can manage the disease, closer monitoring is crucial. A compromised host response or partially controlled systemic conditions contribute to this moderate risk profile.
Grade C: High Risk
As outlined in the new periodontal classification PDF, Grade C signifies a high risk of further periodontal breakdown. This grade is characterized by a rapid progression of disease, substantial attachment and bone loss, and often, significant inflammation.
Patients typically have poorly controlled systemic diseases, compromised immune responses, or exhibit consistently poor oral hygiene. Aggressive treatment and frequent monitoring are essential to attempt stabilization, though prognosis remains guarded due to the inherent risk factors.

Factors Influencing Grade Assignment
The new periodontal classification PDF highlights that grade assignment considers progression rate, patient age, and systemic diseases—crucial elements for risk assessment.
Rate of Progression
As detailed within the new periodontal classification PDF, assessing the rate of periodontal destruction is paramount when assigning a grade. Rapid progression, characterized by quick attachment and bone loss, typically indicates a higher grade (B or C). Conversely, a slow, stable rate suggests a lower risk profile, aligning with Grade A.
This evaluation necessitates longitudinal data, including regular clinical examinations and radiographic assessments, to accurately chart disease activity over time. The PDF emphasizes that progression isn’t solely linear; periods of stability can occur, requiring careful monitoring and re-evaluation.
Patient Age
The new periodontal classification PDF highlights age as a crucial factor influencing grade assignment. While periodontitis can occur at any age, younger patients (under 35) exhibiting rapid progression often warrant a higher grade (B or C) due to aggressive forms of the disease.
Conversely, older patients may demonstrate slower progression, even with substantial attachment loss, potentially aligning with Grade A. However, age alone isn’t definitive; progression rate and systemic factors must also be considered for accurate grading, as detailed in the document.
Systemic Diseases and Risk Factors
The new periodontal classification PDF emphasizes the significant role of systemic diseases in influencing periodontal grades. Conditions like diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and respiratory illnesses demonstrably impact periodontal health and disease progression.
Patients with poorly controlled systemic conditions typically receive a higher grade (B or C) due to increased susceptibility and compromised healing. Smoking, stress, and genetic predisposition are also key risk factors detailed within the classification, influencing overall grade assignment alongside clinical findings.
Specific Periodontal Diseases and Conditions
The new periodontal classification PDF details specific conditions like necrotizing gingival diseases, periodontitis linked to systemic issues, and drug-induced gingival problems.
Necrotizing Gingival Diseases (NGD) & Necrotizing Periodontal Diseases (NPD)
As outlined in the new periodontal classification PDF, Necrotizing Gingival Diseases (NGD) and Necrotizing Periodontal Diseases (NPD) are distinct destructive inflammatory conditions. These are characterized by rapid tissue necrosis, often accompanied by pain and bleeding.
NGD primarily affects the gingiva, while NPD involves attachment loss and bone destruction. Predisposing factors include systemic conditions, poor oral hygiene, and compromised immune systems. Accurate diagnosis, detailed within the classification, is crucial for appropriate antimicrobial therapy and supportive periodontal care to halt progression.
Periodontitis Associated with Systemic Diseases
The new periodontal classification PDF recognizes a strong bidirectional relationship between periodontal disease and systemic conditions. Diabetes, cardiovascular disease, respiratory illnesses, and pregnancy complications can all influence periodontal health, and vice versa.
This category acknowledges that systemic factors can modify the clinical presentation and progression of periodontitis. Management requires a collaborative approach between periodontists and physicians, addressing both oral and systemic health to achieve optimal patient outcomes, as detailed in the classification.
Drug-Induced Gingival Diseases
The comprehensive PDF of the new periodontal classification specifically addresses gingival overgrowth and other changes induced by certain medications. Commonly implicated drugs include calcium channel blockers, anticonvulsants, and immunosuppressants.
These conditions are categorized separately as they represent a distinct etiology for gingival inflammation and require tailored management strategies, often involving medication adjustments in consultation with the prescribing physician, as outlined within the classification document.

Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions – Classification
The new periodontal classification PDF details peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis, differentiating them from periodontitis, offering specific diagnostic criteria for each condition.
Peri-Implant Mucositis
As outlined in the new periodontal classification PDF, peri-implant mucositis signifies an inflammatory reaction in the soft tissues surrounding a dental implant, without any loss of supporting bone. This condition is characterized by redness, swelling, and potentially bleeding upon probing, mirroring gingivitis around natural teeth.
Importantly, it’s considered a reversible condition with appropriate treatment, such as improved oral hygiene and professional cleaning. The classification emphasizes early detection and management to prevent progression to peri-implantitis, a more severe form involving bone loss. Accurate diagnosis, detailed within the PDF, is crucial for effective intervention.
Peri-Implantitis
The new periodontal classification PDF defines peri-implantitis as an inflammatory process affecting the soft and hard tissues around an osseointegrated dental implant, resulting in loss of supporting bone. This is a more advanced stage than peri-implant mucositis, and unlike mucositis, it’s generally considered irreversible.
The classification details radiographic evidence of bone loss as a key diagnostic criterion. Treatment aims to halt progression, but complete regeneration of lost bone is often challenging. The PDF stresses the importance of preventative measures and early intervention to minimize bone loss and maintain implant stability.

Distinction between Periodontitis and Peri-Implantitis
The new periodontal classification PDF clearly delineates periodontitis – affecting natural teeth – from peri-implantitis, impacting dental implants. While both involve inflammation and bone loss, their etiology differs. Periodontitis stems from bacterial biofilms and a host response, while peri-implantitis often involves biomechanical factors and implant surface characteristics.
The PDF emphasizes that peri-implantitis lacks the connective tissue attachment present in periodontitis. Diagnosis relies on probing depths, bleeding on probing, and radiographic bone loss around implants, differing from assessments on natural teeth.
Utilizing the Classification in Clinical Practice
The new periodontal classification PDF facilitates precise diagnoses, tailored treatment plans, and improved patient communication regarding prognosis and necessary interventions.
Accurate Diagnosis and Treatment Planning
Leveraging the detailed 2017 periodontal classification PDF empowers clinicians to move beyond traditional assessments. This system, focusing on stages and grades, allows for a more nuanced understanding of disease severity and progression.
Consequently, treatment plans can be precisely tailored to individual patient needs, moving away from generalized approaches. The PDF’s framework supports informed decisions regarding non-surgical and surgical interventions, ensuring optimal outcomes and resource allocation. Accurate staging and grading, guided by the classification, are crucial for effective management;
Prognosis and Patient Education
The new periodontal classification, thoroughly outlined in its PDF format, significantly enhances prognostic capabilities. By clearly defining stages and grades, clinicians can provide patients with realistic expectations regarding treatment outcomes and potential disease progression.
This detailed system facilitates effective patient education, enabling individuals to understand their specific condition and the importance of diligent oral hygiene. The PDF serves as a valuable tool for explaining the long-term implications and the necessity of ongoing maintenance therapy for sustained periodontal health.
Documentation and Reporting
Utilizing the standardized terminology within the new periodontal classification PDF is crucial for accurate and consistent documentation. This system allows for precise reporting of periodontal status, facilitating clear communication between dental professionals and enabling effective tracking of disease progression over time.
Detailed records, adhering to the classification’s framework, are essential for insurance claims, research purposes, and legal considerations. The PDF provides a standardized approach, minimizing ambiguity and ensuring comprehensive patient records.

Accessing the Full Classification Document (PDF)
The complete 2017 periodontal classification PDF is readily available through official AAP resources, online databases, and relevant journals for detailed reference.
Official AAP Resources
The American Academy of Periodontology (AAP) provides direct access to the official 2017 classification PDF on their website. This resource is the definitive source for understanding the new framework.
Members typically have prioritized access, while non-members can often find it through the AAP’s publications section or educational materials.
Look for dedicated pages outlining the workshop’s findings and downloadable documents detailing the staging and grading systems. The AAP ensures clinicians utilize the most current, evidence-based guidelines.
Online Databases and Journals
Several online databases, like PubMed and Scopus, index publications referencing the new periodontal classification PDF. Accessing articles detailing the workshop’s methodology and implications provides valuable context.
Journals such as the Journal of Periodontology frequently publish research applying the new classification in clinical settings.
Many universities and institutions offer library access to these resources, ensuring widespread availability of the classification details and related studies.
Ensuring Use of the Latest Version
Periodontal research evolves; therefore, consistently verifying you’re utilizing the most current new periodontal classification PDF is crucial. The AAP frequently updates resources based on emerging evidence.
Check the official AAP website for the latest document release date. Beware of outdated versions circulating online.
Regularly revisiting AAP resources guarantees adherence to the most accurate and clinically relevant classification system, improving diagnostic precision.

Future Directions in Periodontal Classification
Ongoing research focuses on genetic predispositions and biomarkers, potentially leading to personalized periodontal medicine and refinements within the PDF classification.
The Role of Genetic Predisposition
Emerging research highlights the significant influence of genetic factors on susceptibility to periodontal diseases, as detailed within the evolving classification PDF. Identifying specific gene polymorphisms associated with increased risk could revolutionize preventative strategies.
Currently, the classification acknowledges genetic influence as a contributing factor, but future iterations may incorporate genetic testing to refine risk assessments. This personalized approach, guided by the PDF, promises more targeted interventions and improved patient outcomes, moving beyond generalized treatment protocols. Understanding these genetic links is crucial for predicting disease progression.
Biomarkers and Personalized Periodontal Medicine
The new periodontal classification PDF anticipates a future driven by biomarkers, enabling personalized treatment plans. Identifying specific molecular signatures in gingival crevicular fluid or saliva will allow for early disease detection and risk stratification.
These biomarkers, not yet fully integrated into the current classification, promise to move beyond traditional clinical assessments. This shift towards precision medicine, detailed within the PDF, will optimize therapeutic interventions, tailoring them to individual patient profiles and maximizing treatment efficacy while minimizing adverse effects.
Ongoing Research and Refinement
The 2017 periodontal classification, outlined in the PDF, isn’t static; it’s a living document. Continuous research focuses on refining the staging and grading systems, particularly regarding the interplay between systemic diseases and periodontal health.
Further investigation into genetic predispositions, detailed within supplemental materials to the PDF, aims to enhance risk assessment. Expect iterative updates as new evidence emerges, ensuring the classification remains a relevant and accurate tool for clinicians and researchers alike, promoting optimal patient care.